Mobile Design · School Project · 10 Weeks

What If the Time You Spent Scrolling Actually Taught You Something?

Hero — iPhone mockups showing the learning feed and study builder, full bleed

RoleUX/Product Designer
TypeAcademic Project
Timeline2024
Background

Only 9% of people feel their time online is well spent. That's a design problem.

TikTok proved that humans will scroll indefinitely when the interaction model is right. The format isn't the problem — it's what the format delivers. Scientia uses the same scroll mechanic to deliver education, redirecting a habit that already exists rather than asking users to build a new one.

Research

50 surveys, competitive analysis across MasterClass, Duolingo, and TikTok, and one clear direction.

94%Of respondents engage with social media daily
77%Want more productive online experiences
48%Spend 2–4 hours per day on short-form platforms

The problem was visible. The solution direction was, too: stay familiar to what users already do, and deliver substantive content through a format they don't have to think about. Key findings shaped early personas and user journeys — grounding the design in real behaviors rather than assumptions about how learning "should" work.

Persona callouts and survey insight visualizations

Design

Four features, one through-line: make learning feel effortless.

Learning Feed

A vertically scrolling feed of short educational videos. Same UX as existing social platforms. Different payload. Users go from passive consumption to active learning without changing how they interact with their phone.

Gamification

Badge-earning for milestones, visual progress indicators per learning path. Borrowed from Duolingo's playbook — clear progress signals are what separates apps users return to from apps they abandon.

Directed Study Paths

Curated sequences that surface the next most relevant piece of content. Addresses the analysis paralysis of open-ended learning platforms where too much choice results in no choice.

AI-Powered Study Builder

Users upload existing material (PDFs, lecture notes) and Scientia auto-generates short-form, scrollable content from it. The goal: study on your own terms, in the format you'll actually use.

Learning feed screens — vertical scroll view with topic tags, creator info, and progress indicator

Study Builder — upload screen and auto-generated scrollable output side by side

Directed path flow and badge / milestone system

Results

Usability testing across structured tasks and satisfaction scores.

Improvement in perceived productivity during scroll sessions
9%→37%Users saying their time online felt ‘well-spent’
40%Estimated increase in weekly return rates (gamification)
31%Estimated increase in content completion (directed paths)
Increase in self-reported preparedness using Study Builder
Reflection

The design question wasn't how to make learning engaging. It was whether engagement mechanics can be genuinely redirected — or just rebranded.

I think the answer is yes, but only if the design is honest about what it's doing. Scientia doesn't hide its engagement mechanics. It points them at something worth doing — and gives users the tools to learn on their own terms.

The AI study builder was the most interesting design challenge: how do you present a machine-generated experience that feels genuinely useful rather than gimmicky? The answer was keeping the user in control of the input and making the output immediately actionable.

Next steps would be deeper A/B testing on content formats and iteration on the recommendation algorithm — making sure the feed gets smarter with every scroll, not just faster.

← All work